Quando mais é menos: recursos adesivos como desincentivo a recorrer DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v6n1p115-127

Authors

  • Henrique Haruki Arake Cavalcante UNICeub
  • Ivo Teixeira Gico Jr. UNICeub

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v6n1p115-127

Abstract

Muitos acham que, na interação estratégica em litígios no judiciário brasileiro, é racional recorrer sempre. Disto decorreria que o ótimo individual leva ao brejo coletivo - no caso o colapso do judiciário devido ao excesso de recursos. Análise à luz da teoria dos jogos sugere que não necessariamente, particularmente no caso do recurso adesivo. A interação estratégica entre os agentes pode levar à exclusão da alternativa “recorrer sempre” para os agentes racionais.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Henrique Haruki Arake Cavalcante, UNICeub

Professor e Doutorando

Downloads

Published

2016-01-12

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): Economic Analysis of Law Review

Section

Papers

License

The submission of a paper to Economic Analysis of Law Review implies the transfer, by the author(s), to the Catholic University of Brasília (UCB), of the aforementioned work for purposes of reproduction, dissemination, distribution, printing, publication and availability.

This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public provides greater global democratization of knowledge.

Authors who submit manuscripts for publication in EALR irrevocably agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright but grant Economic Analysis of Law Review the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Commons Attribution-Share License, after publication, allowing the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors and EALR are authorized to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).