A CULTURALIST PERSPECTIVE ON TRILATERAL TAIPEI-BEIJING-WASHINGTON RELATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31501/ealr.v7i1.7319Abstract
This paper presents Western analysts and policy makers with a brief analysis of the importance of the trilateral Washington-Taipei-Beijing relationship, and argues for a reconceptualization of that relationship to factor in the polarization of cultural identity in those three nations and how this finds expression in foreign policy on the cross-strait issue, among other areas. The intent herein is to make a case for the adoption of a multi-theoretical approach that injects a culturalist interpretation of the fundamental schisms present in each society that influence their respective worldviews and relations to other powers.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The submission of a paper to Economic Analysis of Law Review implies the transfer, by the author(s), to the Catholic University of Brasília (UCB), of the aforementioned work for purposes of reproduction, dissemination, distribution, printing, publication and availability.
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
Authors who submit manuscripts for publication in EALR irrevocably agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright but grant Economic Analysis of Law Review the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Commons Attribution-Share License, after publication, allowing the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors and EALR are authorized to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).