Philosophy and education: every discourse precedes an ideological configuration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31501/periagoge.v4i1.12100

Keywords:

carteis, combate aos carteis, danos de carteis, defesa da concorrência, políticas antitruste

Abstract

The present article aims to develop a problematization supported by discourse analyses. Its main materiality consisted of two speeches by the current President of Brazil: one given at the inauguration ceremony in Congress in January 2019, and the other a national address on Covid-19 in March 2020. The former speech emphasizes the need to contradict international health organizations for economic development, while the latter advocates for governing "without ideological bias". In light of these materials, this text seeks to problematize the possibility of a subject, their discourse, and their respective practices without an ideological configuration. These issues are emphasized based on some of the main theoretical references in the area, such as Louis Althusser (1985), Eni Puccinelli Orlandi (1942), Michel Pêcheux (2014), and Valentin Volóchinov (1895), along with some commentators, such as Cavalcante (2009).

Author Biographies

  • José Aparecido de Oliveira Lima, Federal University of Alagoas
    Graduado em Filosofia (UFAL); Mestre em Educação  Brasileira (UFAL) e Doutorando em Educação (PPGE/CEDU/UFAL). Participa do Grupo de Pesquisa: Filosofia e Educação/Ensino de Filosofia. Atualmente é Professor Efetivo Estadual de Educação (SEDUC) e bolsista CAPES.
  • Junot Cornélio Matos, Federal University of Pernambuco

    Docente do Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL) e docente adjunto da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Graduado e Mestre em Filosofia Social. Doutor em Educação pela UNICAMP. Líder do grupo de pesquisa: Ensino de Filosofia e Filosofia e Educação.

Published

2023-06-27

Issue

Section

Artigos Livres

How to Cite

Philosophy and education: every discourse precedes an ideological configuration. (2023). Periagoge, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31501/periagoge.v4i1.12100