Português

Abstract

The article analyzes the Public Prosecutor's Office (PPO) as an essential institution for the judicial function, highlighting its historical evolution (remote origins in Egypt, Greece, and Rome), constitutional principles (indivisibility, functional independence), and rational and selective performance. It emphasizes the Resolutive MP, focusing on pragmatism and utilitarianism to resolve conflicts without excessive judicialization. It discusses instruments such as the Term of Conduct Adjustment (TAC) (hybrid legal business), Recommendations, public and collective hearings. It explores the intervention of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the Third Sector (foundations, associations), with oversight, approval of statutes, and dissolution in cases of irregularities. It concludes with the need for effectiveness in defending the legal order and diffuse interests.